Upcoming book talks in Leicester, Glasgow and Tübingen

Digital Contention in a Divided Society, Manchester University Press 2024.

This month the paperback version of Digital Contention in a Divided Society (featuring a new afterword) is published. It can be ordered on the Manchester University Press website here.

I will be having three book launch events in England, Scotland and Germany over the next three weeks. Details of each are below.

Leicester

I am delighted to be back in Leicester for a book talk on 24 April, hosted by John Coster (Documentary Media Centre). There is no need to register for this free event. Details are below.

Date & Time: Wednesday 17th April 17:00 -19:00

Venue:: Orso Coffee Shop, 4 Market Place, Leicester LE1 5GF

Glasgow

Date & Time: Wednesday 24th April 18:00 -19:30

Venue: 237 Advanced Research Centre (ARC), University of Glasgow, 11 Chapel Lane, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Join Paul Reilly (University of Glasgow) and host, Dave Scott (Nil by Mouth), to celebrate the paperback launch of Paul’s book, Digital contention in a divided society: Social media, parades and protests in Northern Ireland.

They will discuss the role of social media in protests and civil unrest in Northern Ireland, followed by a Q&A session. There will be a drinks reception afterwards.

Please register for this free event here

Tübingen

With thanks to Dr. Giuliana Source, I will be delivering a lunchtime talk at the Institut für Medienwissenschaft at Tübingen University. Details on the talk can be found here.

Date & Time: Monday 29 April 12:00-13:00 (CET)

Venue: Raum 215

Book event: (De)constructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization, 16 April

Deconstructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization, Routledge, 2023.

A reminder that we are having an online launch event for our edited volume on societal threats and mediatization next week. Details below.

Please join the authors for a launch event to mark the publication of the book ‘Deconstructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization.

This book explores how both elite and non-elite actors frame societal threats such as the refugee crisis and COVID-19 using both digital and traditional media. It also explores ways in which the framing of these issues as threatening can be challenged using these platforms.

People typically experience societal threats such as war and terrorism through the media they consume, both on and offline. Much of the research in this area to date focuses on either how political and media elites present these issues to citizens, or audience responses to these frames. This book takes a different approach by focusing on how issues such as the refugee crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are both constructed and deconstructed in an era of hybrid media. It draws on a range of traditional and innovative research methodologies to explore how these issues are framed as ‘threats’ within deeply mediatized societies, ranging from content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Macedonian name dispute in Greece to investigating conspiratorial communities on YouTube using Systemic Functional Linguistics. In doing so, this book enriches our understanding of not only how civil and uncivil actors frame these issues, but also their impact on societal resilience towards future crises.

(De)constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization will be a key resource for academics, researchers, and advanced students of Communication Studies, Media Studies, Journalism, Cultural Studies, Research Methods, Sociology and Politics.

The chapters included in this book were originally published as a special issue of The Communication Review. Many thanks to our authors for their excellent contributions, which are listed below:

1. Framing the Macedonian name dispute in Greece: Nationalistic journalism and the existential threat
Minos-Athanasios Karyotakis

2. The “ultimate empathy machine” as technocratic solutionism? Audience reception of the distant refugee crisis through virtual reality
Zhe Xu and Mengrong Zhang

3. A systemic functional linguistics approach to analysing white supremacist and conspiratorial Ddscourse on YouTube
Olivia Inwood and Michele Zappavigna

4. Internet regulation and crisis-related resilience: From Covid-19 to existential risks
Gregory Asmolov

The book can be ordered here

Please register for the online book launch here

Book talk in Glasgow, 24 April

This month the paperback version of Digital Contention in a Divided Society (featuring a new afterword) is published. It can be preordered on the Manchester University Press website here.

I will be having a book launch event in Glasgow on 24 April. Hosted by Dave Scott (Nil by Mouth), there will be a Q&A session followed by a drinks reception.

Date & Time: Wednesday 24th April 18:00 -19:30

Venue: 237 Advanced Research Centre (ARC), University of Glasgow, 11 Chapel Lane, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Join Paul Reilly (University of Glasgow) and host, Dave Scott (Nil by Mouth), to celebrate the paperback launch of Paul’s book, Digital contention in a divided society: Social media, parades and protests in Northern Ireland.

They will discuss the role of social media in protests and civil unrest in Northern Ireland, followed by a Q&A session. There will be a drinks reception afterwards.

Please register for the event here

About the book

How are platforms such as Facebook and Twitter used by citizens to frame contentious parades and protests in ‘post-conflict’ Northern Ireland? What do these contentious episodes tell us about the potential of information and communication technologies to promote positive intergroup contact in the deeply divided society? These issues are addressed in what is the first in-depth qualitative exploration of how social media were used during the union flag protests (December 2012-March 2013), the Ardoyne parade disputes (July 2014 and 2015), and the ‘Brexit riots’ in April 2021. The book focuses on the extent to which affective publics, mobilised and connected via expressions of solidarity on social media, appear to escalate or de-escalate sectarian tensions caused by these hybrid media events. It also explores whether citizen activity on these online platforms has the potential to contribute to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland.

Book talk in Leicester on 17 April

This month the paperback version of Digital Contention in a Divided Society (featuring a new afterword) is published. It can be preordered on the Manchester University Press website here.

I am delighted to be back in Leicester for a book talk on 24 April, hosted by John Coster (Documentary Media Centre). There is no need to register for this free event. Details are below:

Date & Time: Wednesday 17th April 17:00 -19:00

Venue: Orso Coffee Shop, 4 Market Place, Leicester LE1 5GF

Join Paul Reilly (University of Glasgow) and host, John Coster (Doc Media Centre), to celebrate the paperback launch of Paul’s book, Digital contention in a divided society: Social media, parades and protests in Northern Ireland. 

About the book

How are platforms such as Facebook and Twitter used by citizens to frame contentious parades and protests in ‘post-conflict’ Northern Ireland? What do these contentious episodes tell us about the potential of information and communication technologies to promote positive intergroup contact in the deeply divided society? These issues are addressed in what is the first in-depth qualitative exploration of how social media were used during the union flag protests (December 2012-March 2013), the Ardoyne parade disputes (July 2014 and 2015), and the ‘Brexit riots’ in April 2021. The book focuses on the extent to which affective publics, mobilised and connected via expressions of solidarity on social media, appear to escalate or de-escalate sectarian tensions caused by these hybrid media events. It also explores whether citizen activity on these online platforms has the potential to contribute to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland.

New article on Instagram and memories of Troubles published in Information, Communication & Society

I have a new article out in Information, Communication & Society this week. Entitled ‘Random access memories or clichéd representations? Exploring historical photographs of the troubles on Instagram’, it explores 100 historical photographs of the Troubles on Instagram.

.The abstract can be read below:

Social media provide unprecedented opportunities for the distribution of photographs capturing experiences of conflict. Instagram in particular renders conflict photography searchable, whilst also aggregating the memories of traumatised communities. This paper adds to the nascent literature in this area by exploring how the photosharing app is used to share photographs of the Northern Irish ‘Troubles’, a low-intensity conflict that resulted in 3,600 fatalities and left many more bereaved, injured and traumatised. Two decades on from the Belfast Agreement, Northern Ireland remains a deeply divided society in which competing narratives over the conflict remain deeply entrenched. This study explored photographic representation of the Troubles, with a specific focus on who was represented in these images and whether they were evoke personal memories of the conflict. A content and narrative analysis of 100 historical images tagged #thetroubles was conducted in order to explore these issues. Results indicate that images showing the ‘peculiarity’ of everyday life during the conflict, such as armed British soldiers standing in close quarters to children playing in the street, were the most prominent visual representations under this hashtag. The memories evoked by such historical photographs reinforce zero-sum narratives on conflict, rather than promote new interpretations that build support for peace in ‘post-conflict’ societies.

The article is published Open Access and can be found here

Many thanks to the editors and reviewers for their help in getting this out. i would ALSO like to express my gratitude to Ekatherina Zhukova and Marguerite Borelli for their comments and input on earlier versions of this paper.

Deconstructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization online book launch 16 April

Dear all,

Please join the authors for a book launch event to mark the publication of the book ‘Deconstructing societal threats during times of deep mediatization’. This will be held online on 16 April (9-10:30am GMT).

This book explores how both elite and non-elite actors frame societal threats such as the refugee crisis and COVID-19 using both digital and traditional media. It also explores ways in which the framing of these issues as threatening can be challenged using these platforms.

People typically experience societal threats such as war and terrorism through the media they consume, both on and offline. Much of the research in this area to date focuses on either how political and media elites present these issues to citizens, or audience responses to these frames. This book takes a different approach by focusing on how issues such as the refugee crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are both constructed and deconstructed in an era of hybrid media. It draws on a range of traditional and innovative research methodologies to explore how these issues are framed as ‘threats’ within deeply mediatized societies, ranging from content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Macedonian name dispute in Greece to investigating conspiratorial communities on YouTube using Systemic Functional Linguistics. In doing so, this book enriches our understanding of not only how civil and uncivil actors frame these issues, but also their impact on societal resilience towards future crises.

(De)constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization will be a key resource for academics, researchers, and advanced students of Communication Studies, Media Studies, Journalism, Cultural Studies, Research Methods, Sociology and Politics.

The chapters included in this book were originally published as a special issue of The Communication Review. 

Many thanks to our authors for their excellent contributions, which are listed below:

1. Framing the Macedonian name dispute in Greece: Nationalistic journalism and the existential threat

Minos-Athanasios Karyotakis

2. The “ultimate empathy machine” as technocratic solutionism? Audience reception of the distant refugee crisis through virtual reality

Zhe Xu and Mengrong Zhang

3. A systemic functional linguistics approach to analysing white supremacist and conspiratorial Ddscourse on YouTube

Olivia Inwood and Michele Zappavigna

4. Internet regulation and crisis-related resilience: From Covid-19 to existential risks

Gregory Asmolov

The book can be ordered here and you can register for the online book launch here

Frozen in time: Walking the Green Line in Nicosia

Last week I visited the last divided city in the world for the first time. The inevitable online search for tourist attractions in the Cypriot capital highlighted the United Nations Buffer Zone (or ‘Green Line’) as a must-see.  It was also recommended that tourists bring their passports and cross over into the Turkish side of the city. Having previously visited Belfast’s ‘peace walls’ and the few remaining sections of the Berlin Wall, I was keen to see how the urban landscape of Nicosia had been shaped by conflict. So, my friend and I gathered our passports and set off from our hotel to explore the Greek and Turkish sides of the city.

Watchtower in UN Buffer Zone

Our first stop was the Green Line Hut, an abandoned security checkpoint situated close to the buffer zone. A Greek flag painted on a nearby wall and a series of ‘Stop’ signs were visible reminders of its previous function. These were overshadowed by an even larger warning sign telling tourists that photographs were prohibited. A few yards away was our first glimpse of the buffer zone. Boarded up buildings were visible behind barbed wire fences. A sign on a security access gate confirmed entry was forbidden and warned that no parking was permitted in front of it. 

Abandoned street in UN Buffer Zone

What was particularly striking was how everyday life continued as normal in the immediate vicinity. A large green bin was stationed in front of the Hut. We also witnessed a resident bringing shopping into their house, which was on the ‘Green Line’ and only a few metres away from the abandoned buildings in the buffer zone.

Green Line Hut

Our next stop was the Ledra Palace Border Crossing Point. A sign next to the checkpoint on the Greek side showed pictures of two men who had lost their lives protesting against the Turkish occupation

Poster at Ledra Palace Crossing Point

A quick inspection of our passports and we were finally in the UN controlled area. Signs of the UN presence were everywhere, from car park spaces reserved for its personnel to signs outside the Ledra Palace Hotel (now a UN base) outlining its various peace initiatives on the island.

Ledra Palace hotel, UN Buffer Zone

Yet just across the road an abandoned house, with sandbags instead of windows and weeds growing over its roof, was a visual reminder of the violence 50 years earlier.

Abandoned house in UN Buffer Zone

A few hundred yards down the road we arrived at the next checkpoint, marked by several Turkish flags and a banner declaring ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus FOREVER’.

Border checkpoint, North Nicosia

 We had been told that the north felt very different than the south. This was certainly our experience. There were few modern high-rise office blocks and the high-street stores near our hotel were nowhere to be seen. Instead, a mix of gold, jewellery and fake designer gear were on display in the predominantly empty shops we passed. In contrast to the Costa and Starbucks in the south, men sat outside Turkish coffee houses and restaurants playing dominos and other board games. What appeared to be a vintage Pepsi billboard outside a café was emblematic of a city that had barely changed in decades.

Shopping district in North Nicosia

Returning across the border, we walked along the Green Line from the southern side. At the aptly named Berlin Café I was warned by a soldier not to take photographs of a military lookout post. We were able to peer over into the buffer zone by standing on a bench, against the backdrop of a banner calling on tourists to ‘Remember Cyprus’.

UN Buffer Zone viewed from south side of Green Line

Once again, there was a sense that local residents were going about their daily lives against the eerie backdrop of the Green Line.  A white car was parked next to a barricade of white oil drums and barbed wire close to the Church of the Holy Cross. A banner welcomed Pope Francis on behalf of the Catholic community of Cyprus.

Barricade near Church of Holy Cross

I would strongly recommend walking the Green Line in Nicosia if you haven’t done so before. It serves as a reminder of the devastating impact that war has on people’s lives, possessions and property. Hopefully a solution to the ‘Cyprus problem’ can be found, one which sees a complete demilitarisation of the buffer zone and a new life returning to this decaying urban landscape.

Media play increasingly important role in conflict memory

What role do photographs and other visual media play in shaping perceptions of conflict? Do news media have a responsibility to ensure future generations ‘never forget’? How have digital platforms helped shape collective memories of traumatic events?

These were among the many issues discussed at ‘Media and Conflict Memory’, an IAMCR sponsored workshop held at the University of Glasgow in November 2023. This event brought together a diverse group of researchers to discuss the role of media in remembering conflict. 

Day 1 saw the majority of papers presented remotely. Panels covered topics such as the use of X (formerly Twitter) for memory activism in Zimbabwe, how young Nigerians used Facebook to document police brutality, and Gazan citizens’ use of smartphones to share experiences of military occupation. A session dedicated to the Russian invasion of Ukraine then provided new insight into how memes and digital technologies represented a virtual battleground in the ongoing conflict. 

The first in-person panel focused on media representations of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. A recurring theme here was how photographs of atrocities such as Bloody Sunday had become used to support different narratives on the conflict. Context was provided on how a BBC Radio series had been developed to help bridge the competing narratives on Irish history and the origins of the Troubles. There was also evidence presented showing how popular memes were used both constructively and divisively to discuss the region’s troubled past.

Memes focussing on legacy of Troubles

We finished the day with a Q&A session about the documentary Freedom to Run featuring filmmaker Cairsti Russell and hosted by John Coster. The film focuses on two running groups, one based in Palestine and the other from Glasgow, as they participate in marathons in their respective countries. Several clips were shown illustrating the restrictions on the movement of Palestinians in the West Bank, including several unsettling scenes showing settler communities harassing and recording the running groups as they toured Hebron. The conversations afterwards focused on the experiences of the filmmakers, the challenges of documenting their experiences when faced with such repression, and the feedback received during recent screenings.

Freedom to Run

Day 2 saw the focus switch more to innovative methods of exploring conflict memory. This included how researchers used Telegram to examine Russian-Ukrainian battles over contested heritage sites, YouTube videos and collective memories of the Greek civil war, and two papers exploring colonialism and migration memory activism in Portugal. A multisensory presentation showcased how horseshoe cartography could be used to map conflict sites through film, text and collages. It was striking how many of the examples discussed in these panels were under-researched. For example, the Dersim massacre in Turkey has lived on through personal photographic archives while images of Nepti the Tiger, a British military mascot during the Malayan insurgency in the 1950s, remain long forgotten in museum archives. 

Participants at Media and Conflict Memory workshop, Glasgow, November 2023

There were a few common themes from the workshop I wish to end on. First, many of the presenters reflected on their proximity to the conflicts they studied. Many felt a moral duty to provide evidence about how these were memorialised and passed down to future generations. Second, there was the lack of a fixed understanding of conflict represented in both traditional and digital media platforms. There will always be a section of the audience who choose not to agree with dominant readings of these conflict memory materials. Finally, while the digitization of conflict memory was viewed as generally positive in terms of accessibility, there were concerns that traumatic incidents were constantly relitigated and weaponised by those with no direct lived experience of them. In this respect, both traditional and digital media often highlight the lack of shared narratives on war and conflicts of the past.

Interview with John Coster for #16DaysofActivism

This week I was interviewed by John Coster (Doc Media Centre) for the Parallel Lives Network’s 16 Days of Activism.

In a wide-ranging conversation, we reflected on the role of media in how we remember conflict, some of the key themes in papers presented at our recent workshop in Glasgow, and the horrific events unfolding in Gaza.

Many thanks to John for the invitation and the engaging chat (as always!). The interview can be viewed below:

Programme for Media and Conflict Memory workshop published

In a few weeks time I will be hosting a workshop on Media and Conflict Memory at the University of Glasgow. This event is co-sponsored by the Crisis, Security and Conflict Communication and Communication in Post and Neo-Authoritarian Societies Working Groups of the International Association of Media and Communication Researchers (IAMCR). 

The programme for the workshop, including abstracts for each paper, can be viewed here.

If you would like to attend the online sessions then please email me (paul.reilly@glasgow.ac.uk) no later than 13 November.